GT1 | GT2 | GT3 | GT4 | GT5 | GT6 | GT7 Grupo de Trabalho
1 Marcio Ferreira da Silva [1] Introduction With
the advance of ethnographic research in Amazon and Central Brazil over
the past thirty years, two distinct and apparently irreconciliable versions
of gender relations have emerged. I refer to these in “male domination”
and “sexual equality.”
[2]
The first centers on the structural-functionalist distinction between the
public and private domains and privileges phenomena such as dual organization,
political economic control over reproduction, and relations between communities.
Within this perspective, “masculine” and “feminine” are associated with
the (encompassing) political or the (encompassed) domestic spheres of
these social formations. The other position, arising from the cultural-feminist
critique of the public/private distinction, seeks to demonstrate - based
on the intimate character of native economies, the internal relations
of the local group and the mutuality - the perfect equilibrium between
the masculine and the feminine within these societies. In sum, gender
relations are defined either as hierarchical (male domination) or symmetrical
(sexual equality), according to the point of view which corresponds to
evidently irreconciliable positions. The
present communication intends to defend an analytical path that permits
the passage from one conception to the other. I seek to show that genders
in the societies of lowland South America are defined vis-à-vis
one another in terms of kinship
(consanguinity/ affinity). In synthesis, I suggest that gender
and kinship correspond to a system of interdependent signs in the social
philosophies of Amerindian societies. In other words, I propose that a
consideration of sexuality that is sensitive to the intuition underlying
the structuralist theory of kinship formulated some fifty years by Lévi-Strauss.
Let us recall that in this model gender relations are not formulated in
terms of an opposition between “masculine” and “feminine” as absolute
and substantive notions related hierarchically or symmetrically but rather
as a bundle of complex oppositions of relations between individuals of
the same sex and individuals of the opposite sex. Precisely in this sense,
in the feminist contestation of the model of marriage alliance in which
men exchange women, Lévi-Strauss underlined that the structure of alliance
that ground and organize the sociality, function in the same manner with
women exchanging men. The consideration of an exemplary ethnographic case
may allow us to dimly discern the possibility of circumventing the debate
between the alternatives of “male domination” and “sexual equality” in
South American indigenous societies. We may observe how the Enawene Nawe,
an Aruak people of the Southern Amazon define “masculine” and “feminine”
within their social universe. The
sexual emblems Among
the Enawene Nawe, the trajectory towards adult life is socially marked
in both sexes by emblems of sexuality and reproductive capacity: the penis
sheath and tatoos on the belly and breasts, decorations of immense value
in the symbolic economy of the Enawene Nawe are acquired in the course
of what we might call “rites of sexuality.” [3] During
puberty, boys should wait for the growth of pubic hair in order to have
access to a sexual life. This physical transformation of the body is the
necessary but not sufficient condition for the exercise of their sexuality.
In addition they are required to wear a penis decoration. This decoration
consists in a strip of Buriti
palm leaf of approximately thirty centimeters of long by one centimeter
of wide that is tied around the foreskin, with a knot similar to that
of a necktie with the penis forced back into the pelvic region. One day
before the affixing of this ornament, the boy’s mother cuts his hair and
substitutes his childhood body ornaments. Assisted by her daughters, the
mother prepares a fairly large amount of beiju manioc cakes to be offered
to the brother-in-laws of her child (the husbands of his sisters or brothers
of his future spouse) who will officiate at the ritual. During
the daybreak that precedes the awarding of the ornaments, the officiating
brother-in-laws stationed within the clans’ cerimonial house, located
in the centre of the village, begin the final preparations for the ceremony:
the fashioning of a series of items that will be used by the boy during
the course of his initiation, such as arrows, palm strips used to make
the penis sheath, achiote red coloring, palm mats, and palm strips comprising
part of the costume of the yakwa (ritual that celebrates the clan system).
Simultaneously within the boy’s parent’s house, the boy lying in his hammock
is painted with a light layer of achiote over his entire body and dressed
with only a part of the ceremonial costume: the complement of the part
to be offered by his brother-in-laws. At
a given time, one of the initiate’s brothers-in-law (preferably his sister’s
husband) will go and fetch him at his house and lead him to the center
of the village. After this point his close consanguines (parents and siblings)
remain in their house to assemble the gifts which will be offered to the
officiating affines immediately after the bestowal of the penis ornament.
A straw mat is placed in the entranceway of the clans’ cerimonial house
where the initiate will remain lying down until his penis ornament is
bestowed, when he will also receive the remainder of his ceremonial costume.
One of the older brother-in-laws will hold the initiate by his hands while
the others beat him lightly. After a few minutes, the brothers-in-laws
offer bows and arrows to the boy as well as an extras stock of Buriti
palm thatch used to make new ornaments since ornaments deteriorate with
time and need to be substituted. Two or three brothers-in-law will solemnly
lead the boy back to the his close consanguine relative’s residence compartment.
His biological parents and siblings await his return while laying in their
hammocks. When the boy is returned, his parents pay the brother-in-law
with the gifts they have prepared beforehand. With this transaction, the
intitiate comes to potentially enjoy sexual access to the sisters of his
“others.” In sum, if the consanguineal relatives (especially the mother
and father) are responsible for the manufacture of the physical person
of their child (the body), from his conception until puberty, his “others”,
that is, his real or virtual affines are responsible for the manufacture
of his social persona, which is immediately endowed with sexuality. Some
time afterward a “co-brother-in-law” invites the initiate to accompany
him to a spot in the forest that surrounds the village - that is to say
in the opposite direction from where he was led by his brother-in-laws
during the initiation - where he will exchange the showy ceremonial penis
ornament for a more discrete model used in daily life. In contrast to
the boy’s brothers-in-law, the co-brother-in-law receives nothing for
this service. There is only exchange between affines; one does not exchange
between consanguines or between affines of affines as is the case with
co-brother-in-laws. Following
this, the boy returns to his hammock in the company of his co-brother-in-law
where a newly initiated girl offers him two large gourds of a drink prepared
by her mother. The boy drinks this beverage until he vomits the entire
remainder of any food he has ingested previously. After this, his first
meals should be made with brand new utensils unless a person apt to perform
blessings blows over all of the used utensils and the food prepared with
them. From then on, the boy begins a new life characterized by sexuality,
by responsibility for productive activities -agricultural, fishing and
collecting - and by his obligatory participation in ceremonial life. With
females initiation occurs differently, although events are also heavily
ritualized. Since they are very little, girls wear a red-dyed cotton miniskirt.
After her first menstruation a girl is considered ready for sexual activity,
which may only begin after her second period. Her tatoos are performed
precisely in this one month (or one moon) interval. The visible social
signs (which are openly discussed) of the imminence of the transition
from child to adult life are the growth of breasts and the darkening of
the nipples. These signals are taken as indications of the occurrence
of all the other relevant bodily transformations in the same way that
the growth of pubic hairs signals these in a boy’s case. On the first
day of her first menstruation, the girl initiate remains in her hammock.
Informed of the event, her mother asks her husband (the father of her
child) to construct a new partition in the house where the girl may remained
secluded for the length of a single lunar cycle. As their first precautionary
measure the family solicits the aid of a blesser who is charged with blowing
of the kitchen fire of the domestic group to which the girl belongs as
well as her hammock. Simultaneously, new bottle gourds,
pestle, and pots are procured for the girl’s use. On
the following day, the girl’s father collects a certain vine with which
her mother will prepare an infusion to be offered to the girl by a newly-initiated
boy wearing a ceremonial penis adornment.
The infusion has strong emetic properties which results in the
girl vomiting “all the old food” she has eaten previously which had remained
in her body. Afterward the blesser blows over the girl’s head in order
to prevent headaches. The activitiy of the blesser with the girl extends
to the dawn of the third day at which point he [or she] leaves the girl
in order to blow over the rest of the houses in the village. When
the menstrual flux subsides, a tatoo specialist, preferably a sister of
her mother or a mother’s mother scratches a series of vertical lines colored
with Genipapo dye on the belly
and breasts of the initiate. After she is tatooed her hair is cut and
all of her childhood ornaments (necklaces, belts, earrings, bracelets,
etc.) are substituted with new items. Following this the blesser blows
over the house where the girl resides as well as the places where she
bathes and goes to the bathroom and finally over the clans’ house and
a few trees on the outskirts of the village. In this case we can see that
a girl’s initial period of fertility has consequences not only for her
own body but for the entire social universe. At the beginning of the second
menstruation, the girl returns to her seclusion and begins again to observe
food taboos. Once again the blesser comes to blow over her house and the
other houses in the village. In contrast to the penis ornament, the girl’s
tatoos are not paid for since one does not pay for the services of consanguines. The
penis sheath and tatoos on the breast and belly are not merely symbols
of sexuality but parts of the newly initiated person acquired as perpetual
aspects of their being and imbued with a profound cosmic meaning. On the
occasion of their death, on the path to the eno (empyreal heaven, located
behind the visible sky) where the vital essence is destined to reside,
the Enawene Nawe will cross swollen rivers inhabited by gigantic spiders.
These rivers are crossed by means of bridges which are, in fact, huge
non-poisonous snakes. To the living these bridges are the rainbows. Only
people wearing the proper ornaments that mark sexual difference may safely
cross from the earthly path to the sky. Men without penis ornaments as
well as women lacking tatoos are summary devoured by the gigantic spiders
when they attempt to cross the serpent-bridges. Finally,
it is worth noting that pushing the penis shaft partially back into the
body cavity has the effect of considerably increasing the volume of the
scrotum which is the locus of male fertility which enhances its visibility.
In the same fashion, if the vulva is always hidden by the mini-skirt or
by leaves held in place by one or several belts of tucum beads during
the bath, the tatoos visually and tactilely call attention to the potential
for conception, gestation and lactation. This
brief communication regarding the rites for the production of sexuality
in both men and women shows that, in both cases, such events exercise
an influence over much more than the individuals submitted to them. The
fabrication of men and women is a matter that centers fundamentally around
their social “others” and, in its broadest sense, involves the participation
of the entire group. There is no question of opposing “man” and “woman”
rooted in the “public” / “private” or in the “center” / “periphery “ domains.
Although girls are tatooed within the family compartment while boys receive
their penis ornaments in the “clans’cerimonial house”, the blesser does
not only blow over the girl initiate and her hammock but also over all
the houses of the village and even on the “clans’ cerimonial house.” Moreover,
we should not forget that the boy receives ritual paraphernalia not only
in the clans’ house but also within his domestic compartment. In this
particular ethnographic case, the public/private opposition seems to obscure
a more fundamental socio-cosmicological dichotomy, that is, the relation
between consanguinity and affinity. The
definition of sexuality proves to be a fundamental principle of social
order. The paths leading to adult life for both males and females are,
however, defined in opposed directions. Among the Enawene Nawe the articulation
between gender relations and kinship relations associates the categories
of masculinity and femininity with those of affinity and consanguinity,
respectively. Tatoos are produced by consanguineal relatives, others-of-the-same-kind
(mother, mother’s sister, grandmother ,etc.) under the auspices of mutuality,
while the penis ornament is bestowed on a boy by affinal relations--by
others-of-a-different-kind (brothers-in-law) according to a formula of
reciprocity. The opposition
between consanguinity and affinity corresponds to an ordering principle
of the public, domestic, and cosmological spheres, which always manifests
itself as a relation between relations rather than as a relation between
two terms: in sum, a system of signs in the saussurean sense. The gender
opposition, here understood as that derived from the relation between
individual of the same sex and of the opposed sex corresponds to an analogously
ordered system. Rituals
of construction of the opposition and complementarity of the genders make
clear the immediate social character of sexuality. During male initiation,
the relations between individuals of the same gender and same kind show
themselves between the boy initiate and his father; between individual
of the same gender and different kind, between the boy and his brother-in-law;
between individuals of the same kind and different gender, between the
boy and his mother; and between individuals of gender and kind different,
between the boy and the newly initiated girl who offers him the medicinal
beverage which induces him to vomit all the food present within his body
ingested during his time as a child. During female initiation, on the
other hand, a similar set of contrasts are thematized: between individuals
of the same gender and same kind, between the girl initiate and her tatooer;
between individuals of the same kind and different gender, between the
girl and her father; and between individuals of different gender and kind,
between the girl and the newly initiated boy who furnishes her with the
emetic. We can observe in this sense that, despite their differences,
both initiation rites reserve identical roles for relations between individuals
of distinct gender and kind who are males and females in a potential marriage
relation to one another, which immediately evokes a notion of symmetry
and complementarity between the sexes. Nevertheless, female iniciation
apparently do not thematize the opposition between individuals of same
gender and different kind, like husband’s sister/brother’s wife or husband’s
mother/son’s wife. The
acquisition of the penis ornament and tatoos on the breast and belly marks
the beginning of a phase of sexual life which is especially intense, in
some cases, with serval partners who are not limited to the same age but
also with those who are much older. These sexual affairs both before and
during marriage are characterized by a different dynamic than the sexual
life between spouses. There are times when women acquire trade goods from
men and other highly coveted items, such as belts, necklaces, bracelets,
fish, etc. which are literally “exchanged for the vagina.” The ostentatious
use of these goods as well as their quantity corresponds to the visible
signs of a woman’s sexual activity. As marriage approaches men and women
tend to concentrate more fully on sex with their future spouse, although,
they may, in some circumstances, seek out other sexual partners. The
social cosmological context According
to their native ideas, the Enawene Nawe reside on the intermediate level
of the universe, between a level containing celestial spirits and the
level of subterranean spirits. The celestial spirits are beautiful, generous,
playful, of good character, and healthy, living in a world of sexual and
alimentary abundance within a perfect sociological order. The Enawene
Nawe refer to these spirits as their “grandfathers” to whom an almost
absolute power to prevent and cure infirmities is attributed. The celestial
spirits are the owners of honey and of some flying insects and accompany
the Enawene Nawe when they travel on fishing or collecting expeditions,
protecting them from the dangers of the world beyond the village. The
sociological perfection of the celestial world is reflected in the absolutely
perfect architectural symmetry of the “grandfathers’ village” and the
luxuriant nature that surrounds it, which is a inexhaustable source of
all sorts of gastronomic pleasures. On
the other hand, the spirits of the subterranean level are ugly, implacable,
avaricious, insatiable and vectors of disease and death. They are owner
of almost all of the resources found in nature, such as fish, wood, fruits,
and the principle cultivated products. While the celestial spirits share
a reasonably homogeneous physical appearance between themselves, the subterranean
spirits assume extremely variable forms, all hideously disfigured. Moreover,
they are extremely lazy. Since these spirits are the owners of existing
natural resources the Enawene Nawe depend on them for their food and consequently
for the reproduction of their social life. Thus, while the celestial world
is defined fundamentally as a world of the “self-relations,” the world
of humans - as an
imperfect reflection of this world - corresponds to the “relations between
others,” since human reproduction is dependent on the subterranean world
(the world of alterity) . Within
the Enawene Nawe cosmos, the celestial and the subterranean worlds correspond,
respectively, to the archetypes of consanguinity and affinity in their
pure state. The human world, on the other hand, corresponds to an arena
in which these two principles are combined. Therefore the social structure
defines its constitutive units (nuclear family, extended family, residential
group, and clan) precisely in terms of the articulation of these parameters
with the parameters of gender. The
Enawene Nawe ceremonial sphere is notable for its complexity. In general
terms we can observe that the native calendar distinguishes two well-defined
ritual “seasons,” one related to the celestial spirits, coinciding with
the period of high waters and another much more extensive season devoted
to the subterranean spirits. The latter season encompasses the period
of the rising and falling waters and the dry season. If both of these
seasons are essential, the first is marked by much less formality
than the second. This informality can be so extensive that, in
stark contrast to the ceremonies for the subterranean spirits, celestial
spirit ceremonies may be greatly abridged for purely pragmatic reasons. The
ritual complex dedicated to the subterranean spirits is basically characterized
by a dynamic in which the “hosts,” all the women and the men of one or
more clans, remain in the village while the “others”, men from the other
clans, organize large fishing expeditions. While the men who have left
are responsible for gathering fish, those reamaining in the village, together
with some of their sisters (the “hostesses”), process a large quantity
of manioc flour and vegetable salt. The radical separation is symbolically
constructed between those who stay and those who leave, the fishermen
return to the village dressed as threatening subterranean spirits where
they are received by the hosts who are adorned only with their human emblems
of gender. The
hosts, furnishers of manioc and salt porridge, conceive of themselves
as humans and metonymically represent the social whole. At the same time,
the men who have arrived from the fishing expedition metaphorically
represent the subterranean spirits who aggressively invade the
village. Little by little the group of hosts domesticates the group of
spirits by making them lower themselves to grab salt with their hands.
The meeting of these two groups is marked by a series of ceremonies that
include ritual oratory, dances, performances of both instrumental and
choral music by the fishermen, representatives of alterity. The hosts,
that is those representing humans, limit themselvs to remain seated around
the dance circle where they keep stoking the fires that illuminate and
heat the central patio and to serve food and drink to the singing and
dancing spirits represented by the fishermen. The
hosts are defined as a community united by consanguinity in opposition
to the fisherfolk who are related to one another as affinal spirits. In
this regard it is important to note that the hosts are ideally members
of both sexes of a single exogamic clan or clans who do not practice spouse
exchange (being, therefore, “functional consanguines”). Simultaneously,
the fishermen constitute a contingent composed of individuals of the same
gender but of different kinship groups
- that is, as affinally related amongst themselves - representing
all of the other clans. The men who have remained in the village represent
the female role in opposition to men who have arrived from without (representatives
of the spirits) since, during everyday life, women offer porridge to men,
while men reciprocate with fish for the women. Beyond
the formal and rigid aspects of the ritual, other notable differences
distinguish the ceremonies dedicated to the celestial and subterranean
spirit legions. In contrast to what has just been described of the relation
between the Enawene Nawe and the subterranean spirits, the rites that
focus on the celestial spirits are never accompanied by a climate of tension
or simulated hostilities. Moreover, the chants aggregate all of the men
or all of the women in the village center without any further disposition
to differentiate people in terms other than gender. Bodily ornaments and
painting are not used: people are represented as gendered humans and nothing
more. During this period of the Enawene Nawe yearly cycle, all the men
go together to gather honey and fish while all the women apply themselves
to the task of making porridge. With the return of the men to the village,
the gender complementary and sexual equilibrium is stressed. On these
occasions, men exchange honey (“masculine vaginal mucus”) produced by
men for women for porridge (“feminine semen”) produced by the women for
men.[4]
The men run after the women in order to smear honey all over their bodies.
According to the Enawene Nawe, honey smells like the vagina. On the other
hand, the analogy between porridge and sperm is equally evident if one
focuses on the color and consistency of these two substances. In
summary, during the ritual season that focuses on the relation between
the Enawene Nawe and the subterranean spirits (the “Different Others”),
kinship relations are brought forward through the inversion of the opposition
between genders. On the other hand, during the season in which the relationship
between the Enawene Nawe and the celestial spirits (the “Identical Others”)
are foremost, gender
relations are emphasized by neutralizing the opposition between kinship. In
sum, gender and kinship distinctions do not only cross-cut the domestic
kinship sphere but
correspond properly speaking to fundamental cosmological categories through
which the social and cosmological universe is organized. We may now return
to the starting point of our consideration of gender. Based on Enawene
Nawe ethnography we may formulate two hypotheses about gender relations,
one emphasizing “masculine domination” could rest, for example, on the
notion of “control of the social order”, based on the universe of affinity
and, therefore, of masculinity. The hypothesis of
“sexual equality”, in its turn, could be anchored in the production
and dynamics of the social life of this system in which “masculine” and
“feminine” correspond to complementary roles is strict equilibrium. Enawene
Nawe ethnographic data provides support for both of these hypotheses as
long as we realize that they are two faces of the same coin. We
have already noted that rites that produce sexuality associate feminity
and masculinity with consanguinity and affinity, respectively. We then
saw how consanguinity and femininity articulate internally with one another
to identity and to gender relations while affinity and masculinity and
masculinity articulate exxternally to difference and to kinship relations.
Finally, we noted that gender and kinship correspond to cosmological organizing
principles that hold not only between living beings but also in organization
of the entire universe. The Enawene Nawe operation in such a manner that
gender opposition is most visible in the world of beings in “self relations”
when represented in terms of the relation between the Enawene Nawe and
their “Identical-Others” (humans and celestial spirits) while the kinship
opposition appears to be most what is highlighted in the world of difference
of the “relations between others” (between humans and subterranean spirits) The
Javaé of Bananal Island, a Karajá subgroup studied by Patrícia Rodrigues
provides an extremely interesting counterpoint to the Enawene Nawe case.
According to the Javaé, time may be divided into two periods - an anterior
period marked by the absence of sexual relations and a present period
characterized by sex and procreation. Javaé cosmology centers around the
opposition between two beings, the aruanã and the aõni. The first are
the original humans who have been unsuccesful in escaping from the primitive
aquatic world. Among these reigns the empire of consanguinity in a world
in which neither aging nor death exists and food is abundant. Although
they are endowed with sexuality and beautiful physiques, there is no sex
life because all are brothers and sisters to one another.
During rituals their movements are controlled and contrained while
they sing beautiful and rhythmically well defined melodies. In
contrast, the aõni inhabit an invisible terrerstrial dimension and are
strangers to one another. Although sexual differences cannot be observed
among them, they are highly sexual and insaciable. They emit unintelligible
grunts and are ugly, agitated, impulsive and profoundly avaracious. According
to the Javaé, incest or miserliness with food results in humans being
transformed into these creatures. Humans are situated at an intermediate
point between the absolute consanguinity of the aruanã and the absolute
affinity of the aõni. Javaé ceremonial life takes its central theme to
be the control of the aõni by the aruanã. In this contexts, the lyrics
of the songs of the aruanã stress the immeasurable sexual appetite of
the aõni in contrast to their disinterest in sex. The Javaé say the aõni
are the “wives” of the aruanã.
Beyond the ethnographic differences between the Javaé and the Enawene
Nawe it is very tempting to draw parallels between their respective spirit
worlds. A
comparison of the Javaé and the Enawene Nawe allows us to immediately
affirm that gender and kinship categories are indissociable in both cases.
However, the association between the two orders is not formed in the same
manner in both cases. While the Enawene Nawe conjoin affinity and masculinity
and consanguinity and femininity, the contrary occurs among the Javaé.
For these people affinity is feminine and consanguinity is masculine.
In summation, Amerind thought seems to present different possibilities
for the combination of the signs of gender and kinship. We can therefore
conclude that any ethnographic generalization based on the a
priori association between a given gender and a given kinship relation
will be untenable. A
native model This
perspective on the analysis of gender relations enables us to grasp native
concepts regarding gender. The spoken language of the Enawene Nawe contains
categories that express sexual dimorphis: ena (“man, masculine, male sex”)
and wiro (woman, feminine, female sex”) which can be used for humans as
well as animals and spirits. The native terms for the genitalia are akositi
and talasiti, “vagina,” and “penis,” respectively. Moreover, the language
contains gender suffixes -re and -lo (e.g. yaya-re / yaya-lo, “masculine
and feminine shame”). With
the association of gender suffixes and the terms that designate the genitalia,
the Enawene-nawe generate a new pair of concepts in the field of gender
relations, akosita-re and talasita-lo, in order to designate sexually
active men and women, respectively. A morphological analysis of these
terms results in the following literal translation: akosita-re = “vagina + masculine gender suffix” talasita-lo = “penis + feminine gender suffix” The native classification thus appears to corroborate precisely the perspective of sexuality as a system of signs (of relation) rather than a mere opposition between substantive attributes. Moreover, the categories of gender define a system that articulates two assymmetrical oppositions (term and relation) and the inverse (according the to sexual perspective), whereby the term ena (“man”) is to the relation talasita-lo (“woman-for-a-man) as the term wiro (“woman”) is to the relation akosita-re (“man-for-a-woman”). We can sum up by concluding that the genital organ of a gender is the sexual organ of its gender opposite. References ALENCAR SÁ, Cleacir. 1996. As fases da vida: categorias de idade enawene (ru) nawe. Ms. Cuiabá: OPAN - Operação Amazônia Nativa COSTA
JR., Plácido. 1995. A pesca na sociedade enawene-nawe. In
Estudo das Potencialidades e do Manejo dos Recursos Naturais na Área indígena
Enawene Nawe. OPAN, dat. DUMONT,
Louis. 1971. Introduction à deux théories d’anthropologie sociale. Mouton. ___________.
1983. Stocktaking 1981: affinity as a value. In Affinity as Value: Marriage
Alliance in South India with Comparative Essays on Australia. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 145-214 LÉVI-STRAUSS,
Claude. [1949] 1967. Les Structures Élémentaires de la Parenté.
Mouton. (2nd edition) MENDES
DOS SANTOS, Gilton. 1995. Agricultura e coleta enawene-nawe: relações
sociais e representações. In Estudo
das Potencialidades e do Manejo dos Recursos Naturais na Área indígena
Enawene Nawe. OPAN, dat. OVERING,
Joanna. 1984. Dualism as an expression of difference and danger: marriage
exchange and reciprocity among the Piaroa of Venezuela In Kensinger, Kenneth,
org. Marriage Practice in Lowland
South American Societies. University of Illinois Press. RODRIGUES, Patrícia de Mendonça. 1995. Alguns aspectos da construção do gênero entre os Javaé da ilha do Bananal. In Cadernos Pagu nº 5, pp. 131-146. PAGU: Núcleo de Estudos de Gênero/UNICAMP. SILVA, Marcio. 1995. Estrutura social enawene-nawe: um rápido esboço. In Estudo das Potencialidades e do Manejo dos Recursos Naturais na Área indígena Enawene Nawe. OPAN, dat. __________. 1996. O princípio do ‘terceiro incluído’ no parentesco sul-americano: o caso enawene-nawe. m.s. Conferência apresentada ao ciclo 6a. do mês, USP/FFLCH, em 18 de outubro de 1996, dat. VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo. 1986. Araweté: os deuses canibais. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar Editor. __________. 1990. “Princípios de parâmetros: um comentário a L’Exercice de la Parenté. Comunicação do PPGAS, Vol. 17. __________. 1993. Alguns aspectos da afinidade no dravidianato amazônico. In Viveiros de Castro, E. & Carneiro da Cunha, M. (orgs.) Amazônia: etnologia e história indígena. EDUSP/NHII. [1] Mestre em Lingüistica pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas, com dissertação sobre fonologia de uma língua tupi do Alto Xingu (kamayurá), e Doutor em Antropologia Social pelo Museu Nacional, com uma tese sobre parentesco em um povo carib da Guiana (waimiri-atroari). É atualmente Professor do Departamento de Antropologia da Universidade de São Paulo, onde desenvolve pesquisa sobre um povo aruak da Amazônia meridional (enawene-nawe). Nos últimos dois anos publicou os artigos “Linguagem e Parentesco” (Revista de Antropologia v. 42 n.1/2, 1999), “Tempo e espaço entre os Enawene-Nawe” (Revista de Antropologia v. 41 n.2, 1998) e “Masculino e feminino entre os Enawene- Nawe” (Sexta-Feira, n.2, 1998). Seus temas de interesse são parentesco, estruturas sociais sul americanas, lingüística e antropologia. [2] These designations (“male domination” and “sexual equality”) must be understood as shorthand labels. Clearly, we are not dealing with a debate between supporters of an unchanging “primitive machismo” and defenders of a paleolithic “égalité.” Here it is only necessary to emphasize the distinction between perspectives that define, in Amerindian societies, gender relations as either hierarchical or symmetrical. [3] For a vision of the relation between these rites and Enawene Nawe age categories, see the text by Cleacir Alencar Sá (1996). The ethnography presented here about these rites derives from this research which was conducted with my guidance. [4] The symbolism of honey and of porridge, defined respectively as “masculine vaginal mucus” and “feminine semen” calls to mind the classic example of the Araweté (Viveiros de Castro 1986). |